SOCIAL
SECURITY PRESS CONFERENCE
April 26, 2005
Thank you all for coming here.
Today, I am releasing a new report
-- prepared by my office with technical assistance from the non-partisan
Congressional Research Service -- that should be a wake-up call
to anyone who still thinks privatizing Social Security would be
good for the American people.
As this study shows, privatization is a real loser.
In 1981, three counties in Texas decided to opt out of Social Security
and instead provide their public employees with a system of privatized
accounts.
This study compares two sets of families in three different income
brackets. We show what happens to their retirement in 2005 under
Social Security and under the Texas plan.
The bottom line is that Americans are clearly better off with Social
Security’s guaranteed, inflation-protected retirement benefit.
And, minor children are protected with Social Security’s
survivor benefits and completely left out in the Texas plan.
Over the last few months, you have heard many arguments against
privatization -- that it will bankrupt our country, that it will
result in deep benefit cuts, that it will be a windfall for Wall
Street. I have made all of those arguments, and more.
The other side has responded by saying that despite all of that,
it will work. They have asserted again and again that Americans
will be better off with privatized accounts. They can say that no
longer.
By examining the actual system in place in Texas, this study shows
that Americans are worse off with privatized accounts -- not in
theory, but in reality.
I will begin with retirement benefits -- the most extensive part
of this study. All of these charts are included in the actual report,
and you all should have received a copy.
But, I want to go through them and highlight some key points.
This
chart shows the initial
monthly benefits that a married couple receives at age 65 under
Social Security and the Texas plan.
As you can see, low income and middle income workers do better
under Social Security. In fact, the difference in monthly benefits
for someone who earned the median income is $250 per month -- or
$3000 in the first year of retirement.
Only high income earners are better off under the Texas plan in
that first year.
But -- and this is an important point -- Social Security benefits
go up each year with inflation. Annuities under the Texas plan do
not.
The result can be seen here on this chart.
By the age of 70, only five years into retirement, even high wage
workers are better off with Social Security.

And remember that $3000 gap in the first year of retirement for
those who earned the median income?
This chart
shows that by the time these couples reach age 80, the gap is over
$1100 per month.

Because Social Security protects seniors from inflation, at the
age of 80, a couple will receive over $13,000 more that year from
Social Security than from the Texas plan.
This
line graph
shows how, for a median income worker, the gap between the inflation-protected
Social Security benefits and the flat-lined Texas benefit only keeps
growing.
But the Texas plan is not only a loser for seniors. It is also
a loser for children.
Both Social Security and the Texas plan provide survivor benefits,
in the event the worker dies.
But, Texas does not protect minor children. Social Security does.
Our study looked at what would happen to the family of a person
who earned the median income for 20 years and then died at age 40,
leaving a spouse and two minor children behind.
This chart shows
the dramatic difference.

The Texas plan would provide a monthly benefit of $865 per month.
It provides no additional benefit for the children.
But because Social Security protects children, the Social Security
survivors benefit for the whole family is more than two and a half
times greater -- $2,291 per month.
As the President and his supporters continue to push to dismantle
Social Security, I urge the American people to look at what was
done in the President’s home state of Texas.
This study proves that privatizing Social Security is a loser for
the American people.
So let us not take any action to destroy a system that has protected
seniors, widows, and children for decades.
Click here to view the report
Click here to view all charts
|